<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European Patent Office asks itself about software patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://log.openxp.net/2009/03/22/european-patent-office-asks-itself-about-software-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://log.openxp.net/2009/03/22/european-patent-office-asks-itself-about-software-patents/</link>
	<description>Where Linux and standards meet patents and Internets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:57:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patents Roundup: Microsoft Likes Patent Deform, OIN to Strike Back, EU Still Besieged for Software Patents &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://log.openxp.net/2009/03/22/european-patent-office-asks-itself-about-software-patents/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Roundup: Microsoft Likes Patent Deform, OIN to Strike Back, EU Still Besieged for Software Patents &#124; Boycott Novell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.openxp.net/?p=324#comment-354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and it hires lobbying guns for the job. On the face of it, the EPO is selling out and here is the explanation provided by one person a fortnight ago:  Sadly, the questions posed to the EBA are mined with typical EPO philosophy including their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and it hires lobbying guns for the job. On the face of it, the EPO is selling out and here is the explanation provided by one person a fortnight ago:  Sadly, the questions posed to the EBA are mined with typical EPO philosophy including their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

